McCarthy Mills court case
Ive blogged about this despite it not being about technology.
Quite frankly I think this kind of thing is disgusting.
Can someone please tell me why on earth she would need a house in London, a house in the country and a house in the sun?
I dont care how lavish the lifestyle was when she was with Paul McCarthy surely the court should take her previously lifestyle into account?
" Legal sources told the Guardian the relatively short length of the marriage between Mills and McCartney – four years - was not necessarily an indicator that Mills and their daughter would not get a large chunk of McCartney's fortune.
"They had a very, very expensive lifestyle. Even though he had made the money beforehand, all the case law says there should not be a vast difference in lifestyle between the parents. That means she is entitled to a house in London, a house in the country and a house in the sun," said a lawyer associated with divorce cases. "
The McCarthy Mills court case
1 comments:
if the nag gets the houses, she sure will feel like lucy in the sky with diamonds. unfair, poor paul.
Post a Comment